Published 2026-05-19 · Disputes

DIAC vs ICC Arbitration in the UAE: Costs, Speed, and Enforceability (2026)

1. Overview

The Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) are two prominent institutions frequently used for UAE-seated arbitrations. The UAE's Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 (FDL 6/2018) has further solidified the country's position as a hub for international arbitration, with both DIAC and ICC being popular choices among parties. DIAC, being a local institution, has undergone significant developments, including the introduction of its 2022 Rules, which aim to provide a more efficient and cost-effective arbitration process. On the other hand, the ICC, with its 2021 Rules, continues to be a globally recognized and respected institution, offering a wide range of services and expertise. The choice between DIAC and ICC arbitration in the UAE depends on various factors, including the nature of the dispute, the parties' preferences, and the applicable laws. Both institutions have their strengths and weaknesses, and understanding these differences is crucial for in-house counsel when deciding which arbitration clause to include in their contracts. This article aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of DIAC and ICC arbitration in the UAE, highlighting their key features, advantages, and disadvantages.

2. Side-by-side comparison

Feature DIAC (2022 Rules) ICC (2021 Rules)
Governing rules DIAC 2022 Rules ICC 2021 Rules
Default seat Dubai, UAE Paris, France (but can be any city)
Filing/registration fee AED 5,000 (approximately USD 1,360) USD 3,000
Administrative fee structure Based on the amount in dispute (ad valorem) Based on the amount in dispute (ad valorem)
Arbitrator fee basis Ad valorem (with a maximum hourly rate of AED 2,500) Hourly (with a minimum and maximum hourly rate)
Emergency arbitrator Available, with a fee of AED 10,000 (approximately USD 2,720) Available, with a fee of USD 5,000
Expedited procedure threshold Disputes up to AED 1 million (approximately USD 272,000) Disputes up to USD 2 million
Joinder/consolidation Allowed, subject to the tribunal's discretion Allowed, subject to the tribunal's discretion
Scrutiny of awards Minimal scrutiny Scrutiny by the ICC Court
Average duration (standard commercial) 12-18 months 18-24 months
Average duration (expedited) 6-9 months 6-12 months
Default number of arbitrators 1 (sole arbitrator) 3 (unless parties agree otherwise)
Language Arabic or English (unless parties agree otherwise) Any language agreed by the parties
Applicable to consumer disputes No No
Institutional reputation globally Regional reputation, with growing international recognition Highly respected and recognized globally

3. Cost comparison: a worked example

For a USD 5 million dispute, the approximate costs for each institution would be: - DIAC (sole arbitrator): AED 5,000 (filing fee) + AED 150,000 (administrative fee) + AED 300,000 (arbitrator fee) = approximately USD 1,360 + USD 40,800 + USD 81,600 = USD 123,760 - DIAC (3-person tribunal): AED 5,000 (filing fee) + AED 300,000 (administrative fee) + AED 900,000 (arbitrator fee) = approximately USD 1,360 + USD 81,600 + USD 244,800 = USD 327,760 - ICC (sole arbitrator): USD 3,000 (filing fee) + USD 120,000 (administrative fee) + USD 240,000 (arbitrator fee) = USD 363,000 - ICC (3-person tribunal): USD 3,000 (filing fee) + USD 240,000 (administrative fee) + USD 720,000 (arbitrator fee) = USD 963,000

4. When to choose DIAC

The following scenarios may favor choosing DIAC: * The dispute is related to a UAE-based project or transaction. * The parties prefer a more cost-effective arbitration process. * The dispute is relatively small (up to AED 1 million / approximately USD 272,000) and can be resolved through the expedited procedure. * The parties prefer a sole arbitrator, which is the default under DIAC rules.

5. When to choose ICC

The following scenarios may favor choosing ICC: * The dispute involves multiple jurisdictions or parties from different countries. * The parties require a highly respected and recognized international arbitration institution. * The dispute is complex and requires a 3-person tribunal. * The parties prefer a more established and experienced institution with a wider range of services.

6. Emergency arbitrator: key differences

The key differences between DIAC and ICC emergency arbitrator procedures are: - Fee: DIAC charges AED 10,000 (approximately USD 2,720), while ICC charges USD 5,000. - Timeline: Both institutions aim to appoint an emergency arbitrator within a few days, but the specific timeline may vary. - Scope: Both institutions allow emergency arbitrators to grant interim relief, but the scope of their powers may differ.

7. Enforcement considerations

Both DIAC and ICC awards can be enforced in the UAE under the New York Convention (NYC) and the UAE Arbitration Law (FDL 6/2018). However, it is essential to consider the specific requirements and procedures for enforcement in the UAE and other jurisdictions.

8. Practical clause drafting

Model arbitration clauses for each institution are: - DIAC: "Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this contract, including any question regarding its existence, validity, or termination, shall be referred to and finally resolved by arbitration under the DIAC Arbitration Rules." - ICC: "Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this contract, including any question regarding its existence, validity, or termination, shall be referred to and finally resolved by arbitration under the ICC Rules of Arbitration."

9. How we can help

Our team of experts can assist you in choosing the most suitable arbitration institution and drafting a tailored arbitration clause for your contract. Contact us to discuss your specific needs and requirements.

Frequently asked questions

What are the main differences between DIAC and ICC arbitration in the UAE?

The main differences between DIAC and ICC arbitration in the UAE include the governing rules, default seat, filing fees, and administrative fee structures. DIAC has a more cost-effective arbitration process, with a default seat in Dubai, UAE, and a filing fee of AED 5,000. In contrast, ICC has a more established and experienced institution with a wider range of services.

How do the costs of DIAC and ICC arbitration compare in the UAE?

The costs of DIAC and ICC arbitration in the UAE vary, with DIAC being more cost-effective for smaller disputes. For a USD 5 million dispute, the approximate costs for DIAC would be USD 123,760 for a sole arbitrator, while ICC would be USD 363,000. The costs also depend on the number of arbitrators and the complexity of the dispute.

What is the average duration of DIAC and ICC arbitration in the UAE?

The average duration of DIAC arbitration in the UAE is 12-18 months for standard commercial disputes, while ICC arbitration takes 18-24 months. For expedited procedures, DIAC takes 6-9 months, while ICC takes 6-12 months. The duration may vary depending on the complexity of the dispute and the parties involved.

When should I choose DIAC arbitration over ICC arbitration in the UAE?

You should choose DIAC arbitration over ICC arbitration in the UAE when the dispute is related to a UAE-based project or transaction, or when you prefer a more cost-effective arbitration process. DIAC is also suitable for smaller disputes, up to AED 1 million, and when a sole arbitrator is preferred. Additionally, DIAC is a good choice when the parties are primarily based in the UAE.

How does the emergency arbitrator procedure differ between DIAC and ICC in the UAE?

The emergency arbitrator procedure differs between DIAC and ICC in the UAE in terms of the fee, timeline, and scope. DIAC charges AED 10,000 for an emergency arbitrator, while ICC charges USD 5,000. Both institutions aim to appoint an emergency arbitrator within a few days, and both allow emergency arbitrators to grant interim relief, but the specific timeline and scope may vary.

Speak to us